United States v. M. Bernstein & Sons

19 C.C.P.A. 242, 1931 CCPA LEXIS 312

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided November 27, 1931·No. No. 3402·Published

Opinions

Leneoot, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case was originally heard by this court on April 3, 1931, and in a decision rendered on April 27, 1931, Judge Garrett dissenting, the judgment of the Customs Court was reversed. 19 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 59, T. D. 44895.

Within the time fixed by the rules of this court, appellee filed an application for a rehearing, which application was granted, and the case was reargued on October 7, 1931.

We have given careful consideration to the arguments presented upon rehearing and find no reason to change our original decision. For the reasons stated in said decision, the judgment of the lower court is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leneoot, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Within the time fixed by the rules of this court, appellee filed an application for a rehearing, which application was granted, and the case was reargued on October 7, 1931.

United States v. M. Bernstein & Sons, 19 C.C.P.A. 242, 1931 CCPA LEXIS 312 (ccpa 1931).

Pincite

19 C.C.P.A. 242 (United States v. M. Bernstein & Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Neves v. Scott

54 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1852)

Knox v. Lee

79 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1871)

Swan & Finch Co. v. United States

190 U.S. 143 (Supreme Court, 1903)

United States v. Midwest Oil Co.

236 U.S. 459 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.