United States v. Lynch

353 F. App'x 822
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2009·No. No. 09-7413·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Lyn Lynch appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the court did not abuse its discretion and there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lynch, No. 1:99-cr-00322-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. filed July 10, 2009; entered July 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lynch, 353 F. App'x 822 (4th Cir. 2009).

353 F. App'x 822 (United States v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related