United States v. Lynch

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lynch

54 F. App'x 583

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lynch. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 F. App'x 299 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2003·No. No. 02-7416·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Lynch seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lynch has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Lynch, Nos. CR-00-103; CA-02-764-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap[584]*584peal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George Lynch seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lynch has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Lynch, Nos. CR-00-103; CA-02-764-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap[584]*584peal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Lynch, 54 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

54 F. App'x 583 (United States v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related