United States v. Luster

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 9, 2009
• Docket: 08-8430
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8430

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMAR LUSTER, a/k/a Woo,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-00288-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamar Luster, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamar Luster appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Luster,

No. 2:03-cr-00288-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 4, 2008); see United States

v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED