United States v. Lugo

6 C.M.A. 151, 6 USCMA 151, 19 C.M.R. 277, 1955 CMA LEXIS 338, 1955 WL 3433
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided July 1, 1955·No. No. 6200·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:

Following his trial by general court-martial, the accused in this case was found guilty of desertion, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 85, 50 USC § 679. The issue now before us has to do with no more than the sufficiency of the record to support the court-martial’s finding of apprehension. As to this, we are controlled by our opinion in United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272, decided this day, which holds that, under present Army Regulations, a proper morning report entry recording the fact that an accused’s absence was terminated in that manner is both admissible and sufficient to sustain such a finding.

The findings of guilty and the decision of the board of review must be, and are hereby, affirmed.

Chief Judge QUINN and Judge LATI-MER concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lugo, 6 C.M.A. 151, 6 USCMA 151, 19 C.M.R. 277, 1955 CMA LEXIS 338, 1955 WL 3433 (cma 1955).

6 C.M.A. 151 (United States v. Lugo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Leal
6 C.M.A. 166 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
United States v. Antonio
6 C.M.A. 167 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
United States v. McAdams
6 C.M.A. 168 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
United States v. Burks
6 C.M.A. 169 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
United States v. Bongiorni
6 C.M.A. 165 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)