United States v. Lugo
This text of 6 C.M.A. 151 (United States v. Lugo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
Following his trial by general court-martial, the accused in this case was found guilty of desertion, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 85, 50 USC § 679. The issue now before us has to do with no more than the sufficiency of the record to support the court-martial’s finding of apprehension. As to this, we are controlled by our opinion in United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272, decided this day, which holds that, under present Army Regulations, a proper morning report entry recording the fact that an accused’s absence was terminated in that manner is both admissible and sufficient to sustain such a finding.
The findings of guilty and the decision of the board of review must be, and are hereby, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 C.M.A. 151, 6 USCMA 151, 19 C.M.R. 277, 1955 CMA LEXIS 338, 1955 WL 3433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lugo-cma-1955.