United States v. Antonio
6 C.M.A. 167, 6 USCMA 167, 19 C.M.R. 293, 1955 CMA LEXIS 328, 1955 WL 3438
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
This case is controlled by United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272; and United States v. Lugo, 6 USCMA 151, 19 CMR 277. We must hold, therefore, that the morning report entry extract copy before us sufficed to sustain the general court-martial’s finding that the accused’s desertion had been terminated by apprehension. It follows that the findings and sentence, as approved by intermediate appellate agencies, must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Antonio, 6 C.M.A. 167, 6 USCMA 167, 19 C.M.R. 293, 1955 CMA LEXIS 328, 1955 WL 3438 (cma 1955).
6 C.M.A. 167 (United States v. Antonio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Simone
6 C.M.A. 146 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
United States v. Lugo
6 C.M.A. 151 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)