United States v. Antonio

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Antonio

6 C.M.A. 167, 6 USCMA 167, 19 C.M.R. 293, 1955 CMA LEXIS 328, 1955 WL 3438

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedJuly 15, 1955

DocketNo. 6405

StatusPublished

This text of 6 C.M.A. 167 (United States v. Antonio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Antonio, 6 C.M.A. 167, 6 USCMA 167, 19 C.M.R. 293, 1955 CMA LEXIS 328, 1955 WL 3438 (cma 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This case is controlled by United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272; and United States v. Lugo, 6 USCMA 151, 19 CMR 277. We must hold, therefore, that the morning report entry extract copy before us sufficed to sustain the general court-martial’s finding that the accused’s desertion had been terminated by apprehension. It follows that the findings and sentence, as approved by intermediate appellate agencies, must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This case is controlled by United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272; and United States v. Lugo, 6 USCMA 151, 19 CMR 277. We must hold, therefore, that the morning report entry extract copy before us sufficed to sustain the general court-martial’s finding that the accused’s desertion had been terminated by apprehension. It follows that the findings and sentence, as approved by intermediate appellate agencies, must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 C.M.A. 167, 6 USCMA 167, 19 C.M.R. 293, 1955 CMA LEXIS 328, 1955 WL 3438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-cma-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack