United States v. Lowry

254 F. App'x 973
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lowry. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 F. App'x 446
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2007·No. 07-6554·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shane Mack Lowry seeks to appeal the district court’s order of May 1, 2006, 2006 WL 1210313, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion. Following the district court’s order, Lowry filed a motion for a certificate of appealability on June 6, 2006. Ten months later, the district court construed Lowry’s motion as a notice of appeal. Lowry failed to file his motion within the ten-day period in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A). However, with or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985). Lowry filed his motion within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Lowry has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lowry, 254 F. App'x 973 (4th Cir. 2007).

254 F. App'x 973 (United States v. Lowry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)