United States v. Loud
This text of 155 F. App'x 314 (United States v. Loud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Uchechi Loud appeals the district court’s judgment imposing a sentence of 12 months and one day following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess counterfeit security, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 513(a) & 371. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Loud contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights when it ordered restitution. This claim is foreclosed by United States v. Bussell, 414 F.3d 1048, 1060 (9th Cir.2005) (stating that district court orders of restitution are unaffected by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).
Loud’s remaining contentions lack merit. The district court’s judge is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [315]*315courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. App'x 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-loud-ca9-2005.