United States v. Lott

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lott. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 F. App'x 568
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2005·No. 04-11086·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11086 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEVE TRACY LOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-2-ALL --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Steve Tracy Lott has requested

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lott was informed of counsel’s

motion but did not file a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lott, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Lott (United States v. Lott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)