United States v. Lott
This text of United States v. Lott (United States v. Lott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11086 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVE TRACY LOTT,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-2-ALL --------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Steve Tracy Lott has requested
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lott was informed of counsel’s
motion but did not file a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lott-ca5-2005.