United States v. Loren Henderson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 16, 2024
• Docket: 24-6455
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6455 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LOREN PARNELL HENDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cr-00166-RJC-DSC-1)

Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 16, 2024

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Loren Parnell Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6455 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Loren Parnell Henderson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part A of Amendment 821 to the

Sentencing Guidelines. The district court concluded that Henderson was eligible for relief

but declined to reduce his sentence based on its assessment of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

factors and his postsentencing conduct. We conclude that the district court did not abuse

its discretion in denying Henderson’s motion. See United States v. Martin, 916 F.3d 389,

395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

judgment. United States v. Henderson, No. 3:19-cr-00166-RJC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr.

30, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED