United States v. Lora

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lora

62 F. App'x 551

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lora. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 F. App'x 149 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2003·No. 02-6516·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for reproduction of personal legal papers, for information on a deported government witness, and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 15, 2002 & entered Feb. 19, 2002; Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for reproduction of personal legal papers, for information on a deported government witness, and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 15, 2002 & entered Feb. 19, 2002; Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lora, 62 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

62 F. App'x 551 (United States v. Lora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.