United States v. Lora

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-6191

No. 02-6366

Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-358-A)

Submitted: March 15, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders (1)

denying his motion for new trial filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33;

(2) denying his motion to dismiss the indictment under Fed. R.

Crim. P. 12(b)(2); (3) denying his motions to reconsider the denial

of his Rule 12(b)(2) and Rule 33 motions; and (4) denying his

emergency motion for grand jury documents and motion for

appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 14 &

entered Dec. 17, 2001; Jan. 4, 2002; Jan. 9, 2002; Jan. 17, 2002;

filed Feb. 7 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED