United States v. Lopez
This text of 2008 DNH 159 (United States v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States v. Lopez 01-CR-079-SM 08/27/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
United States of America
v. Criminal No. 01-cr-79-l-SM Opinion No. 2008 DNH 159 Carlos Lopez
O R D E R
Defendant's motion to reduce his sentence, based on the
United States Sentencing Commission's retroactive amendment of
the "crack" cocaine guideline (Amendments 706 and 711), effective
March 3, 2008, is necessarily denied.
United States Guideline § lBl.l0(a)(2)(B) makes clear that a
reduction in a defendant's term of imprisonment is not authorized
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the "crack" cocaine
amendment, if the amendment would not have the effect of lowering
the defendant's applicable guideline range. Here, defendant's
guideline range was established by mandatory minimum sentences
prescribed by statute — 20 years (240 months) with respect to
Counts I through V, VII, and VIII, and 5 years (60 months) to be
served consecutively with respect to Count VI. The retroactive
"crack" cocaine amendment does not effectively lower the
applicable guideline range in defendant's case — which remains,
by statute, 240 months and 60 months to be served consecutively. Conclusion
The motion to reduce sentence (document no. 91) is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Sh'even J./McAuliffe (Chief Judge
August 27, 2 00 8
cc: Mark E. Howard, Esq. Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, Esq. Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq. U.S. Probation U.S. Marshal
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 DNH 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-nhd-2008.