United States v. Lopez

2008 DNH 159
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided August 27, 2008·No. 01-CR-079-SM·Published

Opinion

United States v. Lopez 01-CR-079-SM 08/27/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 01-cr-79-l-SM Opinion No. 2008 DNH 159

Carlos Lopez

O R D E R

Defendant's motion to reduce his sentence, based on the United States Sentencing Commission's retroactive amendment of the "crack" cocaine guideline (Amendments 706 and 711), effective March 3, 2008, is necessarily denied.

United States Guideline § lBl.l0(a)(2)(B) makes clear that a reduction in a defendant's term of imprisonment is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the "crack" cocaine amendment, if the amendment would not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range. Here, defendant's guideline range was established by mandatory minimum sentences prescribed by statute — 20 years (240 months) with respect to Counts I through V, VII, and VIII, and 5 years (60 months) to be served consecutively with respect to Count VI. The retroactive "crack" cocaine amendment does not effectively lower the applicable guideline range in defendant's case — which remains, by statute, 240 months and 60 months to be served consecutively.

Conclusion

The motion to reduce sentence (document no. 91) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Sh'even J./McAuliffe

(Chief Judge

August 27, 2 00 8

cc: Mark E. Howard, Esq.

Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, Esq.

Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

U.S. Probation U.S. Marshal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, 2008 DNH 159 (D.N.H. 2008).

2008 DNH 159 (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related