United States v. Lopez-Lopez
This text of 332 F. App'x 417 (United States v. Lopez-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Benjamin Lopez-Lopez appeals from the 235-month sentence imposed following modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Lopez-Lopez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain why it denied his request for a variance below the modified Guidelines range. We review for plain error, see United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm because Lopez-Lopez has not established that any error affected his substantial rights, see id. at 761-62.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-lopez-ca9-2009.