United States v. Lopez-Gomez

646 F. App'x 313
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6015
StatusPublished

This text of 646 F. App'x 313 (United States v. Lopez-Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lopez-Gomez, 646 F. App'x 313 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Lopez-Gomez appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Once imposed, a sentence is final and may be modified only under a narrow set of well-defined circumstances. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012); United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235 (4th Cir.2010). Lopez-Gomez has failed to establish that any of these circumstances is applicable to his case. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials- before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 F. App'x 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-gomez-ca4-2016.