United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga

188 F.3d 1177, 1999 WL 787431

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 1, 1999

DocketNos. 98-50347, 98-50305

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 188 F.3d 1177 (United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 188 F.3d 1177, 1999 WL 787431 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

HUG, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three-judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, [1178]*11781999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

HUG, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three-judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, [1178]*11781999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 F.3d 1177, 1999 WL 787431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lombera-camorlinga-ca9-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack