United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga
188 F.3d 1177, 1999 WL 787431
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 1, 1999·No. Nos. 98-50347, 98-50305·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three-judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, [1178] 1999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 188 F.3d 1177, 1999 WL 787431 (9th Cir. 1999).
188 F.3d 1177 (United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Homdziuk
848 A.2d 853 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
People v. Villagomez
Appellate Court of Illinois, 2000
Rocha v. State
16 S.W.3d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
United States v. Ore-Irawa
78 F. Supp. 2d 610 (E.D. Michigan, 1999)
United States v. Carrillo
70 F. Supp. 2d 854 (N.D. Illinois, 1999)
United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores
188 F.3d 1177 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)