United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores
This text of 188 F.3d 1177 (United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE LOMBERA-CAMORLINGA, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE OROPEZA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 98-50347, 98-50305
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Filed October 1, 1999
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, 1999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F.3d 1177, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8106, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-lombera-camorlinga-united-states-of-america-v-jose-ca9-1999.