United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores

188 F.3d 1177, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8106, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24611
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 1, 1999·No. 98-50347·Published

Opinion

188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE LOMBERA-CAMORLINGA, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE OROPEZA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 98-50347, 98-50305

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed October 1, 1999

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, 1999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores, 188 F.3d 1177, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8106, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24611 (9th Cir. 1999).

188 F.3d 1177 (United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga
188 F.3d 1177 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)