United States v. Lomax

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 26, 2009
• Docket: 08-8321
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE J. LOMAX,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00406-RLW-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence J. Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence J. Lomax appeals the district court’s order

denying the his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendments 706 and 711 of the

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lomax,

No. 3:00-cr-00406-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED