United States v. Logan

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Logan

110 F. App'x 345

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Logan. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 F. App'x 256 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2004·No. No. 04-6580·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Earl Logan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying Logan’s motion for production and disclosure of grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Logan, Nos. CR-99-141; CA-02-197-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 25, 2004; entered Mar. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Earl Logan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying Logan’s motion for production and disclosure of grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Logan, Nos. CR-99-141; CA-02-197-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 25, 2004; entered Mar. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Logan, 110 F. App'x 345 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

110 F. App'x 345 (United States v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.