United States v. Littlejohn

18 C.M.A. 590, 18 USCMA 590, 40 C.M.R. 302, 1969 CMA LEXIS 715
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedSeptember 19, 1969
DocketNo. 22,238
StatusPublished

This text of 18 C.M.A. 590 (United States v. Littlejohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Littlejohn, 18 C.M.A. 590, 18 USCMA 590, 40 C.M.R. 302, 1969 CMA LEXIS 715 (cma 1969).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Absent supplementing evidence, the president’s pro forma inquiry does not satisfy us of the providency of appellant’s plea of guilty to the absences here charged. ■ Cf. United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing may be ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Care
18 C.M.A. 535 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 C.M.A. 590, 18 USCMA 590, 40 C.M.R. 302, 1969 CMA LEXIS 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-littlejohn-cma-1969.