United States v. Little
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Little’s motion to remove the district court’s previous order denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2012). We further deny Little’s motion for return of all materials and property held by USP Lee County. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
533 F. App'x 339 (United States v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.