United States v. Lipscomb

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lipscomb

474 F. App'x 301

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2012·No. No. 12-6671·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Javod Ramon Lipscomb appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lipscomb, No. 3:07-cr-00280-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 29, 2012). We deny Lipscomb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Javod Ramon Lipscomb appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lipscomb, No. 3:07-cr-00280-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 29, 2012). We deny Lipscomb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lipscomb, 474 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 301 (United States v. Lipscomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related