United States v. Lindsey
This text of United States v. Lindsey (United States v. Lindsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY THOMAS LINDSEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-96-313, CA-97-2653-4-22)
Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 2, 1998
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Thomas Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Larry Thomas Lindsey seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Lindsey, Nos.
CR-96-313; CA-97-2653-4-22 (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 1997). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lindsey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lindsey-ca4-1998.