United States v. Lindsey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6525
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELLIS LINDSEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-116-N, CA-95-1227-2)
Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ellis Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Lindsey, Nos. CR-91-116-N; CA-95-1227-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lindsey (United States v. Lindsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.