United States v. Lightfoot
71 F. App'x 290
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lightfoot. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 F. App'x 181 →
Opinion
Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lightfoot, No. CR-98-150 (E.D.Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lightfoot, 71 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2003).
71 F. App'x 290 (United States v. Lightfoot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.