United States v. Lightfoot

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6709

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RONALDO TYNELL LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Tynell,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-98-150)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Lightfoot, No. CR-98-150

(E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED