United States v. Lewis

362 F. App'x 402
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2010
Docket08-20440
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 F. App'x 402 (United States v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lewis, 362 F. App'x 402 (5th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Alfred Lewis, federal prisoner # 72777-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his concurrent 262-month sentences for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base. Lewis challenges the propriety of his sentencing as a career offender, and he also argues that § 3582(c)(2) is applicable to his sentences based upon the retroactive *403 amendments to the crack cocaine guidelines.

Lewis may not use a § 3582(c)(2) motion to challenge the appropriateness of the district court’s application of a career offender enhancement in its calculation of his original sentences. See United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir.1995). Further, the district court did not err in denying relief because “[t]he crack cocaine guideline amendments do not apply to prisoners sentenced as career offenders.” United States v. Anderson, 591 F.3d 789, 791 (5th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant lo 5th Cut. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. United States
176 L. Ed. 2d 1234 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
362 F. App'x 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-ca5-2010.