United States v. Lewis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 F.3d 932
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2001·No. 00-11386·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11386 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JULIAN JERMAINE LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-161-1-H -------------------- September 5, 2001

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Julian Lewis appeals his conviction, based on a conditional

guilty plea, for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

While conceding that the investigatory stop was legal, Lewis

argues that the search of his person and vehicle was unreasonable

under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).

Without a possessory interest in the vehicle, Lewis lacked

standing to complain of its search. See United States v. Elwood,

993 F.2d 1146, 1151 (5th Cir. 1993). Thus, the district court

correctly refused to suppress the pistol found in the car. Lewis

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-11386 -2-

also provides no persuasive argument that district court should

have suppressed his pre-arrest statement acknowledging ownership

of the pistol. See United States v. Landry, 903 F.2d 334, 337

(5th Cir. 1990). Finally, while Lewis complains of the search of

his person, that search did not uncover any evidence.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lewis, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Lewis (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1968)
United States v. Frank Landry
903 F.2d 334 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)