United States v. Lewis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 F.3d 690
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 13, 1999·No. 98-60541·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60541 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. W-91-CR-5-B - - - - - - - - - - July 9, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Anthony Lewis has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and

Lewis has filed a response. Our independent review of the briefs

and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal

is dismissed.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lewis, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Lewis (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)