United States v. Lewis

466 F. App'x 212
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2012·No. No. 11-7495·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wayne Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his mo[213] tion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for a certificate of appealability with respect to the district court’s February 28, 2011 order granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. We conclude that Lewis failed to meet the standard for reconsideration of the order. See Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lewis, 466 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012).

466 F. App'x 212 (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Hutchinson v. Staton
994 F.2d 1076 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)