United States v. Lewis

466 F. App'x 212
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7495
StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 212 (United States v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lewis, 466 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wayne Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his mo[213]*213tion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for a certificate of appealability with respect to the district court’s February 28, 2011 order granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. We conclude that Lewis failed to meet the standard for reconsideration of the order. See Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Hutchinson v. Staton
994 F.2d 1076 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-ca4-2012.