United States v. Lewis

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lewis

333 F. App'x 491

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 22, 2009·No. No. 09-11874·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Daryl M. Lewis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Lewis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Daryl M. Lewis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Lewis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lewis, 333 F. App'x 491 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 491 (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related