United States v. Lewis

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lewis

333 F. App'x 491

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 22, 2009

DocketNo. 09-11874

StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 491 (United States v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lewis, 333 F. App'x 491 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Daryl M. Lewis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Lewis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Daryl M. Lewis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Lewis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lewis-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack