United States v. Lesane

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2009·No. 09-6726·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES STEVEN LESANE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00185-HEH-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Steven Lesane, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Steven Lesane appeals the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Lesane, No. 3:08-cr-00185-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2009). We

deny Lesane's motions for release pending appeal, for relief

under 60(b)(6), and to supplement his appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lesane, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Lesane (United States v. Lesane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.