United States v. Lesane

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lesane

341 F. App'x 907

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2009·No. No. 09-6726·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Steven Lesane appeals the district ' court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 33 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lesane, No. 3:08-cr-00185-HEH-1, 2009 WL 891802 (E.D.Va. Apr. 1, 2009). We deny Lesane’s motions for release pending appeal, for relief under 60(b)(6), and to supplement his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Steven Lesane appeals the district ' court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 33 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lesane, No. 3:08-cr-00185-HEH-1, 2009 WL 891802 (E.D.Va. Apr. 1, 2009). We deny Lesane’s motions for release pending appeal, for relief under 60(b)(6), and to supplement his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lesane, 341 F. App'x 907 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

341 F. App'x 907 (United States v. Lesane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.