United States v. Ledee

762 F.3d 224, 2014 WL 3882492, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15370
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedAugust 8, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2363-CR
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 762 F.3d 224 (United States v. Ledee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ledee, 762 F.3d 224, 2014 WL 3882492, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15370 (2d Cir. 2014).

Opinions

Judge POOLER dissents in a separate opinion.

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellant Micheál Ledee was convicted of crimes stemming from participating via webcam in the sexual abuse of an eight-year-old girl by her mother. To ensure the uninhibited testimony of the underage victim at trial, the district court (Nicholas G. Garaufis, Judge), on motion by the government, closed the courtroom during the victim’s testimony to all persons who were not directly involved in the trial, including Ledee’s parents. Ledee argues that the closure violated his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. We disagree and AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Laurent
33 F.4th 63 (Second Circuit, 2022)
State v. Martinez
2021 ND 42 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2021)
Jordan v. Lamanna
S.D. New York, 2020
State v. Uhre
2018 SD 8 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
United States v. Graham
707 F. App'x 23 (Second Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 F.3d 224, 2014 WL 3882492, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ledee-ca2-2014.