Jordan v. Lamanna

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 9, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-10868·Unknown

Opinion

ECF No. 47 as available only to the parties in this action is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the Motion at ECF No.46. SO ORDERED 11/9/2020 November 6, 2020 ay AA (on rath VIA ELECTRONIC FILING ot ( fAray L. CAVE United States Magistrate Judge Hon. Sarah L. Cave U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: sealing of letter concerning bond co-signers in Jordan v. Lamanna, Case No. 1:18-cv-10868 Dear Magistrate Judge Cave: I write, pursuant to Rule 1(A), Rule 1(G)(2) of the Court’s Individual Practices, and the Court’s Standing Order, 19-mc-583. At the November 2, 2020, oral argument on the State’s motion to stay the judgment and petitioner’s cross-motion for release pending appeal, the Court asked petitioner to identify individuals willing to co-sign a release bond. I respectfully request that the Court permit petitioner to file her letter identifying potential co-signers under seal. In making this request, I appreciate that the public generally has a right to access judicial records, but a party may overcome that presumption by demonstrating competing considerations, including “privacy interests.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). Here, personal privacy interests weigh in favor of sealing the letter. Although the attached letter does not include the kind of information subject automatically to sealing under Federal Civil Rule 5.2, it does include identifying information such as names, cities of residence, and occupations. It is my understanding the documents relating to bond co-signers are ordinarily not made public. Particularly in light of the media attention paid to this case, we submit that application of that general rule is called for here, warranting a court order sealing the attached letter. I have conferred with counsel for the District Attorney, who does not oppose the relief requested. We appreciate the Court’s consideration. Sincerely,

Michael B. Kimberly

M Cc Derm ott 500 North Capitol Street, NW Washington DC 20001-1531 Tel+1 202 756 8000 Fax +1 202 756 8087 Sst FE... ..... US practice conducted through McDermott Will & Emery LLP.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. Lamanna, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Jordan v. Lamanna (Jordan v. Lamanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)