United States v. Leal-Chavez

648 F. App'x 796
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 2016
DocketNo. 15-14638
StatusPublished

This text of 648 F. App'x 796 (United States v. Leal-Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Leal-Chavez, 648 F. App'x 796 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ramiro Lucio Leal-Chavez appeals his 60-month sentence, imposed below the guideline range, after being convicted of illegal entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court did not err by considering the nature of Leal-Chavez’s prior conviction; Leal-Chavez’s constitutional arguments are foreclosed by binding Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit precedent. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. [797]*7971219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); United States v. Beckles, 565 F.3d 832 (11th Cir.2009); United States v. Spears, 443 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Aaron Deshon Spears
443 F.3d 1358 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Beckles
565 F.3d 832 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 F. App'x 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-leal-chavez-ca11-2016.