United States v. Law
This text of United States v. Law (United States v. Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EVERETTE BRYANT LAW,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:93-cr-00066-jlk-1)
Submitted: October 29, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everette Bryant Law, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Urban Baer, Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Everette Bryant Law appeals the district court’s
orders denying him a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008), and denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Law, No. 7:93-cr-
00066-jlk-1 (W.D. Va. May 6, 2008; June 16, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Law, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-law-ca4-2008.