United States v. Laurence John Layton

645 F.2d 21
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 22, 1981·No. 81-1210·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appellant seeks interlocutory review of the district court’s order denying his challenge to venue in that court, 509 F.Supp. 212. The Government, relying on United States v. Martin, 620 F.2d 237, 238-39 (10th cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Stipe v. United States, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 248, 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980), has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has responded, and he agrees that the order appealed from is not subject to interlocutory review.

We adopt the reasoning of Martin and grant the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Laurence John Layton, 645 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1981).

645 F.2d 21 (United States v. Laurence John Layton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related