United States v. Laurence John Layton
This text of 645 F.2d 21 (United States v. Laurence John Layton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks interlocutory review of the district court’s order denying his challenge to venue in that court, 509 F.Supp. 212. The Government, relying on United States v. Martin, 620 F.2d 237, 238-39 (10th cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Stipe v. United States, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 248, 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980), has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has responded, and he agrees that the order appealed from is not subject to interlocutory review.
We adopt the reasoning of Martin and grant the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
645 F.2d 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-laurence-john-layton-ca9-1981.