United States v. Lathon

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lathon

315 F. App'x 447

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 6, 2009·No. No. 08-8391·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Andre Lathon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v. Lathon, No. 4:01-cr00060-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2008), and the reasons stated in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Andre Lathon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v. Lathon, No. 4:01-cr00060-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2008), and the reasons stated in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lathon, 315 F. App'x 447 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

315 F. App'x 447 (United States v. Lathon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related