United States v. Lathon

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 6, 2009
• Docket: 08-8391
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8391

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL ANDRE LATHON, a/k/a Andre,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00060-H-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Andre Lathon, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Andre Lathon appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court, United States v. Lathon, No. 4:01-cr-

00060-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2008), and the reasons stated in

our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247

(4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED