United States v. Lassiter

475 F. App'x 932
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 21, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6938
StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Lassiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lassiter, 475 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shaunte Torrane Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lassiter, No. 2:07-cr-00060-RBS-TEM-3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2012). Because the district court lacked authority to reconsider its initial order, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010), we affirm the court’s denial of Lassiter’s motion to reconsider. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F. App'x 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lassiter-ca4-2012.