United States v. Larry Speed
This text of United States v. Larry Speed (United States v. Larry Speed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6277 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6277
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenneth Richard Godfrey, a/k/a Kenny Speed,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00092-RAJ-1)
Submitted: July 31, 2025 Decided: November 24, 2025
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Kenneth Speed, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6277 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Kenneth Speed, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Having carefully
reviewed the record, we are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and concluding that Speed was not entitled to
compassionate release. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023)
(explaining standard of review); Brodziak v. Runyon, 145 F.3d 194, 196 (4th Cir. 1998)
(recognizing that a decision “within the discretion of the [district] court should be affirmed
even though we might have exercised that discretion quite differently”). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Speed, No. 2:00 cr-00092-RAJ-1 (E.D.
Va. Mar. 21, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Larry Speed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-speed-ca4-2025.