United States v. Larry Speed

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 2025
Docket25-6277
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Larry Speed (United States v. Larry Speed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Larry Speed, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6277 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6277

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenneth Richard Godfrey, a/k/a Kenny Speed,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00092-RAJ-1)

Submitted: July 31, 2025 Decided: November 24, 2025

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Kenneth Speed, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6277 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Kenneth Speed, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Having carefully

reviewed the record, we are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and concluding that Speed was not entitled to

compassionate release. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023)

(explaining standard of review); Brodziak v. Runyon, 145 F.3d 194, 196 (4th Cir. 1998)

(recognizing that a decision “within the discretion of the [district] court should be affirmed

even though we might have exercised that discretion quite differently”). Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Speed, No. 2:00 cr-00092-RAJ-1 (E.D.

Va. Mar. 21, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Larry Speed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-larry-speed-ca4-2025.