United States v. Larry Billian

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 4, 2010·No. 09-3385·Unpublished

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 4, 2010

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 09-3385 Appeal from the United

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, States District Court for the Plaintiff-Appellee, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division.

v.

No. 1:08-CR-31

LARRY D. BILLIAN, William C. Lee, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant.

Order

Our opinion in this appeal, 600 F.3d 791 (7th Cir. 2010), concluded that Billian’s conviction is valid but, after identifying an error in the Guidelines calculation, ordered a limited remand “so that the district judge can tell us whether the error in converting pounds to kilograms affected the exercise of discretion in sentencing. If the judge answers yes, we will remand for a full resentencing; if the judge answers no, we will affirm Billian’s sentence.” The district judge has informed us that the error did affect Billian’s sentence. Therefore, although Billian’s conviction is affirmed, his sentence is now vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing. The mandate will issue immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Larry Billian, (7th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Larry Billian (United States v. Larry Billian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Billian
600 F.3d 791 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)