United States v. Laray Copeland

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6636 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6595

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LARAY KESHAWN COPELAND, a/k/a Ray Ray,

Defendant – Appellant.

No. 21-6636

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:09-cr-00157-BO-1; 7:19-cr-00081- BO-1)

Submitted: September 9, 2022 Decided: September 16, 2022 USCA4 Appeal: 21-6636 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/16/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Laray Keshawn Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 21-6636 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/16/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Laray Keshawn Copeland appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United

States v. Copeland, No. 7:09-cr-00157-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2021); United States v.

Copeland, No. 7:19-cr-00081-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED