United States v. Langley
This text of United States v. Langley (United States v. Langley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rehearing granted, July 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7908
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH O. LANGLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (4:04-cr-00073-FL-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Alan Williams, KEITH A. WILLIAMS, PA, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth O. Langley appeals the district court’s order
granting Langley’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Langley, No. 4:04-cr-
00073-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Langley’s motion
to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Langley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-langley-ca4-2009.