United States v. Lackey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lackey. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. 04-50395·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50395 c/w No. 04-50398 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHAY DALE LACKEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-192-2 --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Shay Dale Lackey

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Brown,

920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), which held that a

district court may order a term of imprisonment to run

consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lackey, (5th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Lackey (United States v. Lackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Welton Brown
920 F.2d 1212 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)