United States v. Lackey

115 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. Nos. 04-50395, 04-50398·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Shay Dale Lackey raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lackey, 115 F. App'x 260 (5th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 260 (United States v. Lackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baez v. United States
544 U.S. 1014 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Cruz v. United States
544 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2005)