United States v. Kunta Redd
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7771
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KUNTA KENTA REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (7:08-cr-00043-D-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Scott Andrew Lemmon, Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kunta Kenta Redd appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of
sentence, denying his motions for leave to appeal and for
privacy protection, and granting the Government’s motion to
seal. Redd confines his relevant arguments on appeal to the
district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error in this ruling.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Redd, No. 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 (E.D.N.C.
Nov. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Kunta Redd (United States v. Kunta Redd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.