United States v. Kunta Redd

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2017·No. 16-7771·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7771

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KUNTA KENTA REDD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (7:08-cr-00043-D-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Scott Andrew Lemmon, Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kunta Kenta Redd appeals the district court’s order denying

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of

sentence, denying his motions for leave to appeal and for

privacy protection, and granting the Government’s motion to

seal. Redd confines his relevant arguments on appeal to the

district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error in this ruling.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Redd, No. 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 (E.D.N.C.

Nov. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kunta Redd, (4th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Kunta Redd (United States v. Kunta Redd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related