United States v. Knox

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Knox

490 F. App'x 585

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2012·No. No. 12-7523·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[586] terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[586] terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Knox, 490 F. App'x 585 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

490 F. App'x 585 (United States v. Knox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related