United States v. Knox
This text of 490 F. App'x 585 (United States v. Knox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[586]*586terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 F. App'x 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-knox-ca4-2012.